Open pvgenuchten opened 1 year ago
As of now I am not favourable to this change. These labels were digitised from the FAO GfSD, modifications should be made carefully and remain in the spirit of that document. Also, these changes should be kept in synch with the documents and the UML model produced by Thomas Reznik and Kathi Schleidt. In general I see this mostly as a limitation on the side of SKOSMOS, as it is not able to use the skos:Concept
class correctly.
I propose to park this PR at least until Milestone v1.1 is completed.
Do you think this is something to flag on the wrb group of iuss?
Or better to skip, assess as an inherent challenge on current state of technology?
this PR aims to start discussion on differentiation in labels, in this case triggered by display in skosmos, where in a default setup a series of abundant labels is displayed
abundant rocks
vsabundant rock coverage
also fixes some issues of incorrect labels (
stone li
,commo
)