Open ronaldtse opened 4 years ago
"context" is vague, and nothing directly matches it; have extended trailing ConceptSource to examples (explicitly names) and notes.
From IEC (https://github.com/glossarist/iev-data/issues/62#issuecomment-769575380)
[...] ISO 10241-1:2011 contains some examples of source references with titles
although I agree that for a standard, one would not normally include the title as described in ISO 10241-1:2011, 6.8, but this is only a recommendation: “The indication of the source should be in coded form and a link or reference to a standard bibliographic description provided.”
Meanwhile, since the rules do not prohibit the inclusion of a title, we should not either.
Maybe you should allow for a short form (without a title) and a long form (with a title) of an xref, where the short form is the default?
So we should allow for a short form (without title) and also a long form (with title, even in the case of a standard), depending on user preference.
Technically, we should allow entering references in ISO 690 format because ISO 10241-1 accepts only the ISO 690 bibliographic format...
This needs to be dealt with in the concept-model and Glossarist.
In addition,
By the way are you aware of the following rule:
This rule applies when a SOURCE only applies to a single language term.
This confirms that SOURCE can apply additionally per-language in addition to per-concept.
This means that we need to have SOURCE for these elements:
Modifications to SOURCE'd elements also need to be desired (if there was a modification).
A source should contain a link or reference to the bibliographic item which the element was SOURCE'd from.