Open skalee opened 3 years ago
- Is it possible to have structured ref in authoritative source?
Yes.
- Is it possible to have plain text ref in related concepts?
Yes.
- Or maybe these are very different kinds of refs and I should keep clear distinction between them (different model classes with different attributes)?
Yes they are different refs that should be kept separately.
- Shouldn't clause, link, or original be attributes of structured ref?
Yes.
Or maybe ref should represent document name only, without clause or link (which potentially may depend on clause)?
There are at least the following two kinds of unstructured refs:
Both can be represented as structured refs.
@ronaldtse Is this completed or is there something that I need to add here?
@HassanAkbar this is not implemented yet.
@HassanAkbar can we action this ticket? Thanks.
@ronaldtse This was a question so I'm not sure what needs to be implemented here. Can you explain what needs to be done in this ticket?
Consider this YAML excerpt:
It refers two documents:
{source: IEV, id: 112-01-11, version: 2010-01}
(supersession)ISO/IEC Guide 99:2007
(authoritative source for French translation)One is structured and another one is plain text. Questions:
cc @ronaldtse