IEV 845-23-055: `designation` is parsed into a strange blob

ronaldtse commented 3 years ago

eng:
  id: 845-23-055
  terms:
  - type: expression
    normative_status: preferred
    designation: spectral chromaticity coordinates
  - type: symbol
    designation: |-
      stem:[r](stem:[λ]), stem:[g](stem:[λ]), stem:[b](stem:[λ]), &lt;CIE 1931 RGB colorimetric system&gt; &lt;système de référence colorimétrique CIE 1931&gt;
      stem:[x](stem:[λ]), stem:[y](stem:[λ]), stem:[z](stem:[λ]), &lt;CIE 1931 standard colorimetric system&gt; &lt;système de référence colorimétrique CIE 1931&gt;
      stem:[r]~10~(stem:[λ]), stem:[g]~10~(stem:[λ]), stem:[b]~10~(stem:[λ]), &lt;CIE 1964 RGB colorimetric system&gt; &lt;système de référence colorimétrique CIE 1964&gt;
      stem:[x]~10~(stem:[λ]), stem:[y]~10~(stem:[λ]), stem:[z]~10~(stem:[λ]), &lt;CIE 1964 standard colorimetric system&gt; &lt;système de référence colorimétrique CIE 1964&gt;
    international: true
  definition: chromaticity coordinates of monochromatic stimuli
  language_code: eng

ronaldtse commented 3 years ago

Well, in the Excel it is actually like this:

<i>r</i>(<i>&lambda;</i>), <i>g</i>(<i>&lambda;</i>), <i>b</i>(<i>&lambda;</i>), &lt;CIE 1931 RGB colorimetric system&gt; &lt;système de référence colorimétrique CIE 1931&gt;<br><i>x</i>(<i>&lambda;</i>), <i>y</i>(<i>&lambda;</i>), <i>z</i>(<i>&lambda;</i>), &lt;CIE 1931 standard colorimetric system&gt; &lt;système de référence colorimétrique CIE 1931&gt;<br><i>r</i><sub>10</sub>(<i>&lambda;</i>), <i>g</i><sub>10</sub>(<i>&lambda;</i>), <i>b</i><sub>10</sub>(<i>&lambda;</i>), &lt;CIE 1964 RGB colorimetric system&gt; &lt;système de référence colorimétrique CIE 1964&gt;<br><i>x</i><sub>10</sub>(<i>&lambda;</i>), <i>y</i><sub>10</sub>(<i>&lambda;</i>), <i>z</i><sub>10</sub>(<i>&lambda;</i>), &lt;CIE 1964 standard colorimetric system&gt; &lt;système de référence colorimétrique CIE 1964&gt;

ronaldtse commented 3 years ago

Looks like this in the current Electropedia.

ronaldtse commented 3 years ago

The appropriate modelling is to have multiple symbols, where each symbol links to a "domain" (a domain could be a concept, and in this case they are defined in IEV).

This violates the ISO 10241-1 model where a symbol is not supposed to have domain or usage notes.

Either we formally support it, or not. Will consult IEC.

ronaldtse commented 3 years ago

Wow, this is actually part of 10241-1:

So "usage information" can be set per-symbol.

We will need to update our term model to support this.

@skalee can you help do this? Thanks!

glossarist / iev-data

IEV 845-23-055: `designation` is parsed into a strange blob #130