Concept 103-02-04 supersedes 103-02-04:2009:12. There are no other entries like this one. It looks like a typo, I suppose it should be 103-02-04:2009-12 instead. But maybe we should ask for clarification first, what do you think @ronaldtse? Obviously it won't be a big deal to fix it on our end if this is preferred.
Concept
103-02-04
supersedes103-02-04:2009:12
. There are no other entries like this one. It looks like a typo, I suppose it should be103-02-04:2009-12
instead. But maybe we should ask for clarification first, what do you think @ronaldtse? Obviously it won't be a big deal to fix it on our end if this is preferred.