Closed sug0 closed 6 years ago
This is not a fix, but rather introduces a bug instead. If you would have bothered to run the test, you would have discovered that on your own.
fair enough but that's not the proper foldl behavior if you want to be consistent with the definition; foldl is this: (((a - b) - c) - d)
This is not a fix, but rather introduces a bug instead. If you would have bothered to run the test, you would have discovered that on your own.