Closed ubhuiyan closed 2 weeks ago
Association of "10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121495" and "G56749GV" is for sure coming from some downloaded/source file and here is a framework (series of questions) I want you to answer to find out which download file is giving that information.
Okay, here is my thought process:
human_proteoform_citations_glycosylation_sites_unicarbkb.csv
human_proteoform_glycosylation_sites_unicarbkb.csv
known_33167210_glygen.csv
When you look into the source file, the PMID is already listed (unsurprisingly given the file itself is named after this PMID):
[sbhuiyan28@glygen-vm-dev current]$ awk -F, '{print $6, $10, $(NF-10)}' known_33167210_glygen.csv | grep "G56749GV"
toucan, Pmid, doi
G56749GV 33167210 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121495
G56749GV 33167210 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121495
G56749GV 33167210 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121495
G56749GV 33167210 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121495
So I am a bit unsure why we are displaying the DOI on the front end instead of the PMID in this case.
Great! Now, I will look into it
I see both of them, I don't see what the harm is ... let's ignore this problem for now.
I meant more so in the publications section. It displays the DOI but all other resources appear to have PMID displayed if it is available. Regardless, the paper is cited anyway so I suppose it is fine how it is.
I found an instance where we provided the DOI for a publication, but there appears to be a PMID available now (PMID: 33167210). In these instances, do we update the resource or leave it as is? I found this on the detail page for G56749GV.