Closed fwkoch closed 3 years ago
Hey @cvasey, @dbrookes96, @rminhxm, @markgodresse, @jeremybutlermaptek, @bluetyson - Here is the first somewhat meaty PR up for review since getting you all on board to review. For a bit more context, you can take a look at the prototyping notebook linked in my previous comment. If you have comments on that, feel free to submit a review on the closed PR https://github.com/gmggroup/omf/pull/65 as well.
Let me know if you have any questions! For more general discussion I also created https://github.com/gmggroup/omf/issues/79
Merging #78 into dev will decrease coverage by
1.56%
. The diff coverage is88.88%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #78 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 96.61% 95.05% -1.57%
==========================================
Files 11 10 -1
Lines 502 586 +84
==========================================
+ Hits 485 557 +72
- Misses 17 29 +12
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
omf/__init__.py | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
omf/blockmodel.py | 90.96% <88.79%> (-4.16%) |
:arrow_down: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 52dc6a9...7f3dce6. Read the comment docs.
VolumeGridElement
toTensorBlockModel