search

gmuc4i / c2sim-ldm

C2SIM LDM
2 stars 2 forks source link

[C2SIM doc Section 3] - There is no “family” of C2SIM standards #32

Open xaviercuneo opened 6 years ago

xaviercuneo commented 6 years ago

The C2SIM product is designed to be a single standard. There is no “family” of C2SIM standards. The cornerstone is to share a reference model. The analogy for a common set of LDM elements is the same as the HLA FOM…. It's an interoperability "on purpose reference model".

jmpullen2 commented 6 years ago

Not sure I agree totally with this. I agree that the standard we are working on is designed to be a single standard.

But the C2SIM concept is explicitly intended to be extended into multiple domains. If standardized, the specifications for those domains could be thought of as a family of standards.

Mark

On 11/8/17 9:48 AM, Xavier Cuneo wrote:

The C2SIM product is designed to be a single standard. There is no “family” of C2SIM standards. The cornerstone is to share a reference model. The analogy for a common set of LDM elements is the same as the HLA FOM…. It's an interoperability "on purpose reference model".

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/gmuc4i/c2sim-ldm/issues/32, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFvzyXO503dgWLQXfI8jwpAlm0olFeLdks5s0b8_gaJpZM4QWfqU.

xaviercuneo commented 6 years ago

The C2SIM "family of standards" is also mentioned in the introduction. It has to be fixed also in the introduction.

xaviercuneo commented 6 years ago

Mark, You're faster than my browser :-) @jmpullen2 Just to mention, my last comment wasn't a reply to your comment but a way to track the other references to the "C2SIM family of standards"....

I agree that in the future, a family of C2SIM standards may emerge.... Although we're so far from this point that I'm wondering if it's good to mention it. It seems to me both a bit presomptuous to talk about a "C2SIM familly of standards" as there is only one for HLA and a bit erroneous if we aim at "simplicity and unicity" more than "complexity and multiplity".