Open BenMerSci opened 1 day ago
Oacetis complex
is returned in your query, because complex
is a "popular" annotaion word, that parser usually ignores. I have a list of exceptions to the rule, looks like I need to add Oacetis complex
there
hm, it is weird, I do have Oecetis complex
in exceptions already, I need to investigate. thanks for reporting this @BenMerSci
https://parser.globalnames.org/?code=&format=html&names=Oecetis+complex&with_details=on
I was just about to reply that I was glad this issue wasn't too much of a hassle because I feel like I'm throwing so many issues at you these days...oops Let me know if I can do anything or be of any help!
I think I understood what happened. Until last database update I did run global reparsing of all names, however this time, with new system, only new names were parsed, and Oacetis complex is a recently added exception.. So I will need to reparse all name-strings periodically.
You found a real bug, thanks!
I'm not sure if this is a parser issue, a CatalogueOfLife issue, or if this is similar to this current issue:
When searching for the genus Gymnodinium
, CatalogueOfLife returns a match to the species level:
https://verifier.globalnames.org/api/v1/verifications/Gymnodinium?capitalize=true&all_matches=true&data_sources=1
which links to this entry:
https://www.catalogueoflife.org/data/taxon/3HRW2
for the species Gymnodinium p.dorhni
and authorship Wawrik, 1956
.
Thoughts?
When querying through gnverifier for the genus
Oecetis
and authorshipMcLachlan, 1877
:https://verifier.globalnames.org/api/v1/verifications/Oecetis+McLachlan%2C+1877?capitalize=true&all_matches=true&data_sources=1|3|147
I believe it gets parsed ok by gnparser and the result is the same with or without the authorship.
I get two results that are more 'precise' (to the species level with
Oecetis complex
) than what was queried for (to the genus levelOecetis
). Is this normal behaviour or a bug? I tried a couple of query for different genus and none return a match to a species level.