Closed josojo closed 5 years ago
Finally, I also undid the changes in the makefile for the testing. (actually, I wanted to delete the one commit introducing this change. But since I did not find a good way to do that quickly, I simply pushed a new commit undoing the changes. Hopefully, this will not remove the changes from the other pr. I am not sure about it.)
Maybe we can merge this one rather earlier than sooner. Does not make sense that we keep on working with uint128. If @fleupold you could update your docker with the the pepper supporting field, then also we could test all of this pr.
I'd prefer not diverging from pepper master unless we really need to. If there were comments/changes on your pull request (such as a change in the type name), we'd have to go through the procedure twice.
Let's wait if the PR is merged by Monday and otherwise base the docker image off our branch? I can also ping Max to see if he has any concerns merging this PR. Would that be ok for you?
sounds good
This PR would pass all tests, if pepper recognizes new field type. PR submitted
With the new type: field, which has exactly the same properties as the prime field of the alt-bn-curve, we can simulate the snarks logic much closer to the real logic in cpp. This allows better testing.