gnosisguild / wand-nft

wand-nft.vercel.app
8 stars 6 forks source link

Define final set on NFT metadata & attributes #98

Open jfschwarz opened 2 years ago

jfschwarz commented 2 years ago

Our NFT metadata currently includes:

and the following set of attributes:

Do we want to add any other attributes?

samepant commented 2 years ago

@eccogrinder and @keikreutler @auryn-macmillan would be great to get y'alls input on a more poetic phrase for the description, also any thoughts on other attributes?

I think:

I'm working on a little system for converting the various values into poetic phrases, will post a follow up soon 😈

auryn-macmillan commented 2 years ago

I'm a little confused by both evolution and Holder XP. "Unspent XP associated with owner account" seems to be referring something subtly different from "Holder XP". It seems like the concept that we're trying to get across is the fact that the holder has some balance of XP which could be used/consumed/activated, and that this balance might be different from the total amount of XP that holder has earned.

Perhaps we should disambiguate these states?

One way might be to label them as something like Available XP and Total XP. Another might be to introduce another concept like mana which is earned in lockstep with XP but is consumable to do things like level-up wands.

Governance will have the power to update the metadata after-the-fact, right? So no need to get it perfect.

auryn-macmillan commented 2 years ago

These are my suggestions:

eccogrinder commented 2 years ago

My thoughts below. I know it's kind of a lot, but I personally like NFTs that have complex attributes, even if not all of them are legible or "in use." Also widens the scope, deepens the lore, honors the hard work you all have done, and adds a bit of mystery.

All just suggestions/options.

Metadata:

Level/XP Attributes:

Visual attributes:

Other potential attributes: