Closed Barbaross93 closed 1 year ago
why not just use tmux instead of re-implementing all that logic anew?
Because it doesn't make sense to start a new tmux session with every new terminal?
By that logic, why bother including a way to parse urls with dmenu
and xurls
when we could just do this with tmux:
bind-key u capture-pane \; save-buffer /tmp/tmux-buffer \; run-shell "xurls /tmp/tmux-buffer | dmenu"
By that logic, why bother including a way to parse urls with dmenu and xurls when we could just do this with tmux:
i am agree, that feels also not necessary for terminal emulator
Ok, I guess there is no interest here.
Thanks for the response.
i only left my opinion, mb @neeasade would like it
i only left my opinion, mb @neeasade would like it
I agree, leaving it to the tmux users
By that logic, why bother including a way to parse urls with dmenu and xurls when we could just do this with tmux
This is more an accident of history when I was using xst as my terminal emulator and wanted that bind -- xresources bindings may enable configuring it in a more sensible place in the future
Is there was any interest in including the keyboard-select patch with
xst
?