Closed cbm755 closed 2 years ago
@alexvong243f shall we just comment out the @seealso
for 3.0.0?
Yes, I think we can add iztrans
later.
I (mostly) have an implementation of iztrans
, but I'm not sure if I handle the case where it's not possible to find the inverse transform correctly. Currently, it returns an unevaluated limit of an unevaluated integral (using the definition of course, but there're multiple ways to rewrite the definition into something sympy can represent...) when the inverse transform cannot be found.
For 3.0.0, we could either comment out the
@seealso
line.Of course it should be added back if
iztrans
is added.