Closed gnzlbg closed 6 years ago
When will we move to a signed type for size_type
?
The STL2 does this for ranges, but nobody has suggesting modernizing the containers for the STL2 yet...
On Sun 29. Oct 2017 at 14:28, Vicente J. Botet Escriba < notifications@github.com> wrote:
When will be move to a signed type for size_type?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/gnzlbg/fixed_capacity_vector/issues/30#issuecomment-340262394, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA3NpmfiABFad-czEQG5m0h4lvtL70NXks5sxH1jgaJpZM4QKP1O .
Agreed. We will need a paper that changes this for std2.
the type used to storage the vector size is the one that should be "as small as possible".
...which can be left to QoI.
So this is fixed. @CaseyCarter should that QoI issue be mentioned somewhere? (currently it is not).
should that QoI issue be mentioned somewhere? (currently it is not)
I wouldn't bother.
size_type
should besize_t
, the type used to storage the vector size is the one that should be "as small as possible".