Closed johnsto closed 8 months ago
The readme appears to contain a mistake here, comparing regular OnTXXX to [T]OnXXX calls (respectively):
OnTXXX
[T]OnXXX
Before using them you should consider that the former comes with a pretty heavy performance penalty:
The benchmarks after this paragraph actually show it is the latter, generic [T]OnXXX that carry a significant performance penalty.
It looks like I clarified the document a while back. Thank you for your feedback, and apologies for having this in limbo for so long. :)
The readme appears to contain a mistake here, comparing regular
OnTXXX
to[T]OnXXX
calls (respectively):The benchmarks after this paragraph actually show it is the latter, generic
[T]OnXXX
that carry a significant performance penalty.