Open 6543 opened 4 months ago
I actually didn't quite understand what you mean by that line of code has to be extended but I agree a lot of information is lost on squash. I always split my work into meaningful commits so that I could easily revert one of them if it is not needed or introduces a bug. It is not that easy to revert when they are squashed.
@sahinakkaya that's not a critic of your work :)
it's a follow up issue that propose to also let authors count who are indicated by Co-authored-by
keyword in commit messages :)
the initial implementation ( #27882) does not use the
Co-authored-by:
information in commit messages.but especially in repos like e.g. this one, where squash merge is used, you loose a lot of information.
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/21331be30cb8f6c2d8b9dd99f1061623900632b9/services/repository/contributors_graph.go#L119
has to be extended ...