Closed tlindner closed 3 years ago
I could do that. @go4retro would you rather I patch it like that?
I would actually prefer that. I was planning to do it that way initially. I also like all the extra BPS rates listed, which should help prevent a ton of churn in this chunk of code.
Jim
You could use this more general and platform independent approach:
https://github.com/DOCGroup/ACE_TAO/blob/master/ACE/ace/TTY_IO.cpp#L79