Closed Trevoke closed 6 years ago
@Trevoke You can't find it because we're not ready to persuade people using Goby as a production-ready language. We should have the FAQ section for this question one or two years later 😄
Still thanks for your advice though!
Okay, so ... Does that mean you haven't yet evaluated what's out there and whether Goby should exist at all? Are you still in the prototype-to-evaluate phase?
On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 5:08 AM Stan Lo notifications@github.com wrote:
@Trevoke https://github.com/trevoke You can't find it because we're not ready to persuade people using Goby as a production-ready language. We should have the FAQ section for this question one or two years later 😄
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/goby-lang/goby/issues/610#issuecomment-370136003, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEJSQcmi9kEIsst0-m2Ye89uqf1fAIJks5tamuEgaJpZM4SacjV .
We have some special features listed in feature section, those are the reasons I think Goby is still worth to be developed We just think It’s too early to make a comparison with other mature languages, cause Goby is only one year old
For reference, I think that the closest "new generation" language to Goby is Crystal; Elixir and Pony have different (base) paradigms.
@Trevoke If you're not going to have further discussing, I'm closing it now
Ah, sorry, I missed the previous email! If I understand correctly, the vision for Goby is "Ruby with better concurrency" ?
@Trevoke Not really, it currently looks like Ruby a lot is because it's the language I most familiar with. But our goal is not to be another Ruby implementation. For example, we're still discussing if we should support Ruby's meta-programming features. And we'll definitely have a stricter syntax rule
Okay, so is it fair to say that you don't have a vision for the language? I'm not able to figure out what Goby is for : what problem it solves, what it allows you to do.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, 09:23 Stan Lo notifications@github.com wrote:
@Trevoke https://github.com/trevoke Not really, it currently looks like Ruby a lot is because it's the language I most familiar with. But our goal is not to be another Ruby implementation. For example, we're still discussing if we should support Ruby's meta-programming features. And we'll definitely have a stricter syntax rule
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/goby-lang/goby/issues/610#issuecomment-371500733, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEJSZDeqxd9W1qsTu_7iPG-oA-_iruLks5tcT7DgaJpZM4SacjV .
Let me put it this way: I want Goby to be a language that has Go’s efficiency and Ruby’s productivity
That is already useful, thanks :)
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, 10:00 Stan Lo notifications@github.com wrote:
Let me put it this way: I want Goby to be a language that has Go’s efficiency and Ruby’s productivity
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/goby-lang/goby/issues/610#issuecomment-371512490, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEJSUEx_yD-7XcNUGOjch8XG3TEv4fvks5tcUengaJpZM4SacjV .
So many new languages spring up, it'd be great to have a FAQ section that explains some things about Goby. If there is one, I'm sorry. I couldn't find it.