If no remote validator is given, the csaf_checker emits:
- INFO: No remote validator configured
- INFO: All advisories validated fine.
However, this can cause misunderstandings as the mandatory tests can't be executed without the remote validator (at least right now...).
I suggest we change the text for this case:
- WARN: No remote validator configured
- INFO: All advisories validated fine against the schema.
Even if the remote validator is configured, we need to clarify the result as one can just execute a specific set of tests (e.g. just the informative) that won't invalidate the CSAF documents.
If no remote validator is given, the
csaf_checkeremits:However, this can cause misunderstandings as the mandatory tests can't be executed without the remote validator (at least right now...).
I suggest we change the text for this case:
Even if the remote validator is configured, we need to clarify the result as one can just execute a specific set of tests (e.g. just the informative) that won't invalidate the CSAF documents.
_tested with csafchecker v2.0.1-60-g05ad714