Open 0xFEEDC0DE64 opened 1 year ago
An adjacent issue is that PV mode, or the charge planner, could hopefully factor in the difference in export and import price that owes to certain fixed additional costs and VAT added to spot rate at import but not at export. For example, in Sweden, there is in practice a 0,06EUR subsidy per exported kWh. This means that, even though spot rates do not indicate this, sometimes it is more beneficial to export PV surplus and postpone charging instead to the evening, using imported grid power when there is no PV generation.
In the following example, even though there is a PV surplus and the spot rate is lower at noon, it is in fact best not to charge but postpone charging for later (instead exporting the surplus).
Hour PV surplus Spot rate Export sub. Import fee | Fetched price OPTIMAL GO-E BEHAVIOR
----------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------
12-13 YES 0,015 0,06 (0,04) | 0,075 EUR (sell) DO NOT CHARGE
20-21 NO 0,020+VAT (0,06) 0,04 | 0,065 EUR (buy) CHARGE
VAT=0,25%
Edit: For clarity, at import, piling up atop the spot rate are in my case actually the following add-ons: 1) transfer fee (e.g., 0,04 EUR), 2) energy tax (e.g., 0,049), 3) VAT (0,25%).
At export, there is only 1) export subsidy (0,06).
All this is to say that the decision whether to charge or to export the PV surplus should, best case scenario, be calculated from two parallel price tables, rather than one based on market spot rates.
kalaws,then we really should have the option to do some templating - Or at least have multiple fields. Say use Awatar (Spot price) +/- fixed amount and percentage on import and different on export But here in Denmark we have 3 time zones with different fixed fee. 00-06 06-17 17-21 and 21-00 we use the 06-17 timezone again. For a fixed price transport cost.
And when it comes down to everything, maybe it is better to use Home Assistant to control. There are some HA integrations with relevant calculations.
I think the box should do it for non-PV users.
When I sell electricity, I pay approx 40% tax and 0.008 DKK fee. But on some I will save electricity tax later. If I use it myself, I pay a fixed price (tax of 0.40 DKK) approx 0.16 DKK When I buy it, I pay full spot + 25% VAT + DKK 0.87 electricity tax + transport (0.15DKK to 0.50DKK - Some places up to 2+ DKK from 17-21)
But, for each kWh I sell, I can avoid the DKK 0.87/kWh on one kWh import. And if I export more than I buy over the year, then my surplus export gets a price adjustment up/down such that the few kWh will have an average price of DKK 0.40.
@povlhp did you get any further with this?
No. I Think a good solution would be to have either a custom URL or MQTT key that we could overwrite. Just need the specs of data as well. With Nordpol spot we have prices we can push for the next 24-48 hours.
No. I Think a good solution would be to have either a custom URL or MQTT key that we could overwrite. Just need the specs of data as well. With Nordpol spot we have prices we can push for the next 24-48 hours.
Completely agree with this. Would be fantastic simply to push one's own custom tariff, so that go-e does all the rest of the planning. Much better than trying to manage the charging process itself externally. @peterpoetzi could this be achieved?
No updates on this?
… bump
Discussed in https://github.com/goecharger/go-eCharger-API-v2/discussions/140