Research Object Crate

[github-actions[bot]]

http://purl.org/np/RAcYMfIt1ICpNTg0RCiR0QHfNoSUU-b-5Yw3w06HSL9VA

Review

Item	Detail
Person name	Iseult Lynch
ORCID	0000-0003-4250-4584
FSR long name	Research Object Crate
FSR thing	http://purl.org/np/RAoL8yweXQtkI0nrPZEFwx2ft8DebueFFjWd7rjZr9qOM#RO-Crate
FSR np identifier	http://purl.org/np/RAcYMfIt1ICpNTg0RCiR0QHfNoSUU-b-5Yw3w06HSL9VA
URI of duplicate(s) (multiple separated by ';')	http://purl.org/np/RAoL8yweXQtkI0nrPZEFwx2ft8DebueFFjWd7rjZr9qOM
Links correct	Y
Proposed Links
Definition ok	Y
FSR types ok	Y
FAIRSharing DOI to be added	https://doi.org/10.25504/FAIRsharing.wUoZKE
FSR creator in pubinfo (yellow): FIP Wizard (F) or the ORCID	0000-0002-7567-0311
proposal: accept (A) / Improve (I) / Retract (R) / Disapprove (D)	I
Proposed changes:	Add RO-Crate to long name, Add that it is a "provenance model" and a "metadata-data linking schema". Disapprove duplicate which has only metadata schema listed, Add FAIRsharing DOI

Revisions

Item	Action
actual changes: accept (A) / Improve (I) / Retract (R) / Disapprove (D),URI of updated FSR	D
if FSR is useless, check affected FIPs or SIPs (title)
Updated (U) /Deleted (D) entry in FIP/SIP

[IseultLynch]

Ready to review please.

[TassosP78]

Approve

[mabablue]

Hi both, I disagree! It should also include provenance model, see https://www.researchobject.org/ro-crate/1.2-DRAFT/context.jsonld and see also the RO-Crate project (https://fip-wizard.ds-wizard.org/wizard/projects/c8e39b76-8964-4222-b41b-d3bc83f8193b) from Stian Soiland-Reyes, who is a co-developer of RO-Crate. I also would advice to add "metadata-data linking schema" which RO-Crate certainly is. Also the acronym RO-Crate needs to be added in the long name and it should be mapped to FAIRSharing record: https://doi.org/10.25504/FAIRsharing.wUoZKE.

[burgerga]

@mabablue agree to both! The RO-crate structure documentation shows (in a more human-readable way ;) ) how metadata-data should be linked, and how provenance data could be included.

[IseultLynch]

Thanks @burgerga and @mabablue. Have added the needed improvements and once approved I will go ahead and update the respective nanopublications.

[mabablue]

hi Iseult please use this template: https://nanodash.knowledgepixels.com/publish?106&template=https://w3id.org/np/RAhZcd-dB6RoguEcKrklUSFsl8A1xptMmyNKCkdnb7AMg to update it

[mabablue]

I have disapproved both nanopublication descriptions, created a new one based on this description and improved the FIP that used the duplicate.

[mabablue]

All finished