ISCO-08 | The International Standard Classification of Occupations

[github-actions[bot]]

https://w3id.org/np/RA1qhkgRApF8eT0K31wqsxEW8DTBljNMZAtcA12gqL6BA

Review

Item	Detail
Person name	Fen Zhang
ORCID	0000-0001-7135-3960
FSR long name	ISCO-08 The International Standard Classification of Occupations
FSR thing	https://w3id.org/np/RA1qhkgRApF8eT0K31wqsxEW8DTBljNMZAtcA12gqL6BA#ISCO-08
FSR np identifier	https://w3id.org/np/RA1qhkgRApF8eT0K31wqsxEW8DTBljNMZAtcA12gqL6BA
URI of duplicate(s) (multiple separated by ';')	https://w3id.org/np/RA1qhkgRApF8eT0K31wqsxEW8DTBljNMZAtcA12gqL6BA#ISCO-08
Links correct	Y
Proposed Links
Definition ok	Y
FSR types ok	Y
FAIRSharing DOI to be added
FSR creator in pubinfo (yellow): FIP Wizard (F) or the ORCID	F
proposal: accept (A) / Improve (I) / Retract (R) / Disapprove (D)	I
Proposed changes:	Add link

Revisions

Item	Action
actual changes: accept (A) / Improve (I) / Retract (R) / Disapprove (D),URI of updated FSR
if FSR is useless, check affected FIPs or SIPs (title)
Updated (U) /Deleted (D) entry in FIP/SIP

[dirkdevriendt]

Question to @mabablue maybe: the Semantic model designation would, according to the description, require a definition "according to the Linked Data principles", I'm not sure if this requires publication in a linked data format, because the link only provides Excel/csv versions. The resource could arguably still be considered a "semantic model" because it meets all of the conceptual criteria.

There is an RDF version published by the EU EEA, but that is not necessarily ILO sanctioned, I do not know if:

• it makes sense / adds value to also add a link to this RDF version
• this would suffice to call it a Semantic model

https://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/eurostat/isco08/view