gaby commented 1 month ago

Description

Bump golangci-lint to v1.60.3
Always run markdown-lint workflow
Add check for Body Content Length to Etag middleware. Return error if greater than MaxUint32
Note: There's no easy way to test the 4GB max size other than mocking which is an overkill for this case.

Type of change

[x] Code consistency (non-breaking change which improves code reliability and robustness)

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

Walkthrough

The changes consist of updates to GitHub Actions workflows, modifications to linter configurations, and refinements in test files across the codebase. Key updates include version increments for the golangci-lint-action, removal of file path filters in Markdown workflows, and adjustments to variable declarations in various test functions to enhance clarity. Additionally, new validations and comments were added to ensure better code quality and maintainability.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
`.github/workflows/linter.yml`, `.github/workflows/markdown.yml`, `.golangci.yml`, `Makefile`	Updated linter versions, modified workflow triggers to include all file types, and adjusted linter configurations.
`addon/retry/exponential_backoff_test.go`, `client/core_test.go`, `client/hooks_test.go`, `client/request_test.go`, `ctx_test.go`, `middleware/compress/compress_test.go`, `middleware/encryptcookie/encryptcookie_test.go`, `middleware/pprof/pprof_test.go`, `middleware/static/static_test.go`	Removed redundant variable declarations in test functions for improved readability without altering functionality.
`helpers.go`, `middleware/etag/etag.go`, `middleware/limiter/limiter_sliding.go`, `mount.go`, `router.go`	Added comments and validation checks to enhance code clarity and robustness without changing the overall logic.
`mount_test.go`	Modified error handling response in a test function to reflect a new expected output.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant GitHub Actions
    participant Linter
    participant Codebase

    User->>GitHub Actions: Push changes
    GitHub Actions->>Linter: Run linting process
    Linter->>Codebase: Analyze code
    Codebase->>Linter: Return results
    Linter->>GitHub Actions: Send linting report
    GitHub Actions->>User: Notify results

🐰 Hopping through the code so bright,
With lints and tests, all feels right!
A version bump, a comment here,
Clean code brings us all good cheer!
Let's celebrate with a joyful dance,
For every change, we take a chance! 🎉

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

Early access features: disabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access: - **Anthropic `claude-3-5-sonnet` for code reviews**: Anthropic claims that the new Claude model has stronger code understanding and code generation capabilities than their previous models. Note: Our default code review model was also updated late last week. Please compare the quality of the reviews between the two models by toggling the early access feature. Note: - You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file. - Please join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to provide feedback and report issues on the [discussion post](https://discordapp.com/channels/1134356397673414807/1279579842131787838).

codecov[bot] commented 1 month ago

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 80.01%. Comparing base (9541a88) to head (ae624aa). Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
middleware/etag/etag.go	50.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #3119 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 80.03% 80.01% -0.02% ========================================== Files 117 117 Lines 9035 9038 +3 ========================================== + Hits 7231 7232 +1 - Misses 1373 1374 +1 - Partials 431 432 +1 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/gofiber/fiber/pull/3119/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=gofiber) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/gofiber/fiber/pull/3119/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=gofiber) | `80.01% <80.00%> (-0.02%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=gofiber#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

gofiber / fiber

chore: Bump golangci-lint to v1.60.3 #3119