goharbor / harbor

An open source trusted cloud native registry project that stores, signs, and scans content.
https://goharbor.io
Apache License 2.0
23.16k stars 4.67k forks source link

Provide option for use SAML authentication #4982

Open ddudzinski opened 6 years ago

ddudzinski commented 6 years ago

My company looking for integration with SAML for authentication and great if this can be added to the roadmap.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This issue is being marked stale due to a period of inactivity. If this issue is still relevant, please comment or remove the stale label. Otherwise, this issue will close in 30 days.

UPiotr commented 1 year ago

+1 for SAML OIDC doesn't seem to support Azure AD groups or App Roles, only Windows Server AD groups, which makes me create multiple groups in various domains. Also we cannot use more than one OIDC Admin Group (we have admins in multiple domains)

upstream-dmahlberg commented 1 year ago

We would also love to see Harbor implement SAML Support

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This issue is being marked stale due to a period of inactivity. If this issue is still relevant, please comment or remove the stale label. Otherwise, this issue will close in 30 days.

jiscfoo commented 1 year ago

Pinging…!

teamktown commented 1 year ago

Still relevant to have a SAML interface. @jessehu -- still involved or have guidance on where and/or how this can come to fruition ?

Pexers commented 1 year ago

+1 for SAML authentication.

github-actions[bot] commented 12 months ago

This issue is being marked stale due to a period of inactivity. If this issue is still relevant, please comment or remove the stale label. Otherwise, this issue will close in 30 days.

fooflington commented 12 months ago

Poking the bear for SAML

wsalles commented 10 months ago

+1 for SAML

roysbike commented 9 months ago

+1 for saml

s-kishore-3 commented 7 months ago

+1 for SAML

github-actions[bot] commented 5 months ago

This issue is being marked stale due to a period of inactivity. If this issue is still relevant, please comment or remove the stale label. Otherwise, this issue will close in 30 days.

UPiotr commented 5 months ago

+1 for SAML

On Sun, 4 Feb 2024, 09:04 github-actions[bot], @.***> wrote:

This issue is being marked stale due to a period of inactivity. If this issue is still relevant, please comment or remove the stale label. Otherwise, this issue will close in 30 days.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/goharbor/harbor/issues/4982#issuecomment-1925644480, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A5GQCTEVBFI4GWHB5YQSWTTYR5FIXAVCNFSM4FAHAAHKU5DIOJSWCZC7NNSXTN2JONZXKZKDN5WW2ZLOOQ5TCOJSGU3DINBUHAYA . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

github-actions[bot] commented 3 months ago

This issue is being marked stale due to a period of inactivity. If this issue is still relevant, please comment or remove the stale label. Otherwise, this issue will close in 30 days.

karmicdude commented 3 months ago

Not a stale

github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

This issue is being marked stale due to a period of inactivity. If this issue is still relevant, please comment or remove the stale label. Otherwise, this issue will close in 30 days.

fooflington commented 1 month ago

This issue is being marked stale due to a period of inactivity. If this issue is still relevant, please comment or remove the stale label. Otherwise, this issue will close in 30 days.

It would be nice if someone from the project could make a Yes/No decision on this… rather than seeming to rely on the attrition of needing constant "yes please, this is still needed" until it goes away.

Adding SAML integration to Harbor would be a good thing. There are plenty of mechanisms for doing so, some more tightly integrated than others.