gohopper / jmxquery

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/jmxquery
0 stars 0 forks source link

Having critical less than warning does not work #23

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
# ./check_jmx -U 
service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://10.10.10.10:50500/alfresco/jmxrmi -O 
java.lang:type=Memory -A HeapMemoryUsage -K used -I HeapMemoryUsage -J used 
-vvvv -w 10 -c 100 -username monitorRole -password change_asap
JMX CRITICAL - HeapMemoryUsage.used=415501352 | 
HeapMemoryUsage.used=415501352,committed=2619736064;init=2684354560;max=26197360
64;used=415501352

# ./check_jmx -U 
service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://10.10.10.10:50500/alfresco/jmxrmi -O 
java.lang:type=Memory -A HeapMemoryUsage -K used -I HeapMemoryUsage -J used 
-vvvv -w 10 -c 100 -username monitorRole -password change_asap
JMX CRITICAL - HeapMemoryUsage.used=449934952 | 
HeapMemoryUsage.used=449934952,committed=2619736064;init=2684354560;max=26197360
64;used=449934952

In the 1st example, critical is more than warning, the return value is more 
than both, this is working as expected.

In the 2st example, critical is less than warning, the return value is more 
than both, still return critial.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Should return OK when critial is less than warning and the return is more than 
both.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
jmxquery-1.3

Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by etiennep...@gmail.com on 19 Dec 2012 at 6:14

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I did some testing, it was working in 1.0 but does not work in 1.1, 1.2 and 
1.3.  Thank  you!

Original comment by etiennep...@gmail.com on 19 Dec 2012 at 6:28

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Still appears to be an issue in the latest snapshot.

Original comment by garyho...@gmail.com on 11 Sep 2013 at 4:54

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I think I've fixed this.  Attached is a patch.  Can someone in the project 
apply it?

Original comment by justin.g...@ymail.com on 12 Sep 2013 at 7:24

Attachments: