Open elmauromx opened 5 years ago
/cc @mpvl, @vdobler
I would like to add another case of what appears to be a false negative (xn--03c4b1a). The program is reporting:
Error converting string: idna: invalid label "ิรืเ"
Other IDNA utilities successfully convert a-label to u-label an viceversa
@elmauromx can you confirm that this same issue happens on the latest version of Go? It looks like you are running on go1.11.5.
@katiehockman . It is the same behavior with go1.12.1 for the first case reported:
$HOME/go/bin/go version go version go1.12.1 linux/amd64
xn--diethealth-zp5i diet・health xn--diy-ps4bb d・i・y xn--pfs-ps4bb p・f・s
For xn--03c4b1a it is working good on the new version:
xn--03c4b1a รืเ
Hi. Any update on this?
Is there any update on this? Any plans to fix it?
@mpvl have you had a chance to look into this? Or is there another person that can investigate?
FYI, calling idna.Transitional(false)
is bugged; internally the flag is set to true
regardless of which boolean value you pass. The only way to get false
is to not call Transitional()
at all.
Permalink to the method in current master; the method takes transitional bool
, but the body of the function is o.transitional = true
instead of o.transitional = transitional
.
I looked into this. For now, the idna package implements UTS 46, which has no CONTEXTO requirement – though CONTEXTJ checks are widely deployed. We could certainly add a flag for CONTEXTO support though, for registration profiles. Here's what icu4j's documentation says about CONTEXTO:
This is for use by registries for IDNA2008 conformance. UTS #46 does not require the CONTEXTO check.
Change https://golang.org/cl/317729 mentions this issue: internal/export/idna: fix Transitional
Fixed by https://golang.org/cl/360381.
Maybe fixed? Is the issue here just that idna.Transitional(false)
didn't work (now fixed), or is there something in addition to that? I thought the former, but rereading the comments I'm no longer certain.
https://golang.org/cl/360381 only fixes part of the bug. The original bug here is the lack of CONTEXTO support, which is not yet added, and which should only be used for the Registration profile. Adding CONTEXTO support essentially means implementing the restrictions in Appendices A.3–9 in RFC 5892.
Notice that we already support CONTEXTJ through CheckJoiners, which is enabled by both ValidateForRegistration and MapForLookup (through ValidateLabels).
What version of Go are you using (
go version
)?Does this issue reproduce with the latest release?
Yes
What operating system and processor architecture are you using (
go env
)?go env
OutputWhat did you do?
I wrote an example to convert a-label to u-label an viceversa and also perform IDNA2008 validation based on the provided a-label.
I checked the results with other IDNA tools and found that with net/idna I am not getting context errors that other libraries are reporting.
Here is the main code of the example:
Here are some label examples:
Can you please confirm if this is missing validation of IDNA2008?
Could it be possible to include one new method/flag to get full IDNA2008 validation with the function?
What did you expect to see?
Here are the errors reported for 2 other idna utilities:
What did you see instead?