Open jfcg opened 3 years ago
I would suggest to not mix multiple proposals into a single issue but to create separate issues. This allows to focus discussions on each issue and also aligns with the proposal process accepting proposals by labeling the whole issue.
While 7z
may be available in general I think it is not in base installations of e.g. MacOS and Windows so this would introduce an additional dependency to bootstrap Go when switching away from gz
or zip
.
If choosing another compression algorithm or container format to reduce download size. Why is 7z
preferable over e.g. xz
which is used by other programming languages (pythong, zig, ...) that provide gz
and xz
but not 7z
.
.gz
and.zip
formats are quite behind.7z
in terms of compression ratio. Extracted linux and windows 1.15.4 binary releases are compressed by %30+ more (default commandline, on Manjaro, p7zip 16.02-6 package):7z is widely used & available on all platforms and provides %3 better compression than
xz
with default parameters. I propose to switch to it for all archive formats. Thanks..Note: Updated to add
xz
comparison.