Closed gopherbot closed 6 months ago
In our backport review meeting today, we don't think that this qualifies for a backport at this time because the fix is fairly complex (higher risk) and the underlying issue here is not really a regression. This port always had a 2^16 byte limit. For applications right on the edge of this limit, 1.22 did regress because std got slightly larger, but if the application code had gotten slightly larger it would have encountered the same issue. This should still be fixed for 1.23, of course.
@mauri870 requested issue #64856 to be considered for backport to the next 1.21 minor release.