gabyhelp
commented
3 hours ago Related Issues and Documentation
- proposal: Go 2: Do-While Extension to For-Loops #55868 (closed)
- proposal: Go 2: fix range loopclosure bug #37061 (closed)
- proposal: Go 2: Add ability to use the slice expression [a:b] for more readable for loops and intervals. #64079 (closed)
- proposal: Go 2: run `for` loop in a goroutine with `go` keyword #36407 (closed)
- proposal: Go 2: #51613 (closed)
- proposal: Go 2: #51979 (closed)
- proposal: Go 2: #51136 (closed)
- proposal: Go 2: #53061 (closed)
- proposal: Go 2: #53072 (closed)
- proposal: Go 2: #53150 (closed)
(Emoji vote if this was helpful or unhelpful; more detailed feedback welcome in this discussion.)
seankhliao
lorypelli
Go Programming Experience
Intermediate
Other Languages Experience
JS, TS, Python, C, Java, Kotlin
Related Idea
Has this idea, or one like it, been proposed before?
No, it would be good to make a loop executed at least one time without duplicating code...
Does this affect error handling?
No
Is this about generics?
No
Proposal
sintax like this maybe: i := 0 do { i++ println(i) } for (i < 5)
Language Spec Changes
No response
Informal Change
No response
Is this change backward compatible?
There is an entire new keyword and loop body is in a different place, I don't think so...
Orthogonality: How does this change interact or overlap with existing features?
No response
Would this change make Go easier or harder to learn, and why?
No response
Cost Description
No response
Changes to Go ToolChain
No response
Performance Costs
No response
Prototype
No response