Closed ederenn closed 1 year ago
I'd recommend removing it, because when one will do
yagna payment init --sender --network goerli --driver zksync
yagna panics
[2021-12-01T17:01:03.917+0100 DEBUG ya_zksync_driver::driver] init: Init { address: "0x4c94f8883553ed92f7cffb01eab9968152291027", network: Some("goerli"), token: None, mode: SEND }
[2021-12-01T17:01:03.917+0100 DEBUG ya_zksync_driver::zksync::wallet] init_wallet. msg=Init { address: "0x4c94f8883553ed92f7cffb01eab9968152291027", network: Some("goerli"), token: None, mode: SEND }
[2021-12-01T17:01:03.917+0100 DEBUG ya_zksync_driver::zksync::wallet] get_wallet "0x4c94f8883553ed92f7cffb01eab9968152291027"
thread 'main' panicked at 'called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: "goerli"',
I'd recommend removing it, because when one will do
yagna payment init --sender --network goerli --driver zksync
yagna panics
golemsp never asks yagna for such a thing:
Altough maybe yagna's payment shouldn't panic in this situation (a task for another issue).
My conclusion is that:
command::yagna::ZKSYNC_DRIVER
)yes, all the above is right.
I'd remove goerli
entirely from the yagna codebase, including golemsp
as per this issue.
I'd also fill an issue to fix panicking zksync payment driver, to be fixed later on (eg. in patch release)
I think this is also for the patch release. No need to be fixed immediately.
I'd also fill an issue to fix panicking zksync payment driver, to be fixed later on (eg. in patch release)
I've created an issue: https://github.com/golemfactory/yagna/issues/1740
This will remove the option to test enter / exit from mumbai, asked 2rec about this
@tworec what was the final descision on enter / exit? will we keep goerli?
Together with @prekucki we've decided to support and keep goerli
.
In order to do that we need:
goerli
--> @nieznanysprawiciel / @golemfactory/core
Core team has created two issues related to this:
Leaving the handbook enrichment & verifying ya*api compatibility to @golemfactory/ya-sdk
Closing ticket as Goerli is part of default network since YAGNA 0.12.2
Name: ederenn
if it is a new network, and we are able to use it, should be mentioned in the papers (and maybe in the blogpost) if we are not planning to share info about it, it should be hidden on the list