Open psionic-k opened 10 months ago
Like most linters, it really needs a switch to turn off a check on certain lines or sexps.
Would be happy if there was a simple comment at the end of an sexp to tell the linter to skip it, or turn the linter off for that line.
Deactivating checkers is not granular enough.
A very disruptive workaround that should be granular enough is for one to structure their code such that the "certain lines or sexps" are located in another file which will be excluded from that linter's scope.
Like most linters, it really needs a switch to turn off a check on certain lines or sexps.
Would be happy if there was a simple comment at the end of an sexp to tell the linter to skip it, or turn the linter off for that line.
Deactivating checkers is not granular enough.