Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Please read the paragraph before that line, which explains that the line you
are referencing is boilerplate, and thus the bracketed portions should be
replaced with the appropriate information for the derived work:
APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
identification within third-party archives.
Original comment by ken.lu...@gmail.com
on 20 Aug 2014 at 12:45
I am sorry to be poor at English.
The copyright of the LICENSE file included in Noto-windows.zip is written to be
[yyyy] [name of copyright owner].
https://www.google.com/get/noto/pkgs/Noto-windows.zip
Original comment by kobash...@gmail.com
on 20 Aug 2014 at 1:07
As I explained above, that string in the "LICENSE" file is not an actual
copyright notice, but rather an example or boilerplate copyright notice whose
bracketed portions are expected to be replaced with the information for the
derived work. In other words, this is intentional and not an issue.
The actual copyright notices are specified in the name.ID=0 strings of each
font.
Original comment by ken.lu...@gmail.com
on 20 Aug 2014 at 1:25
Original comment by roozbeh@google.com
on 28 Aug 2014 at 5:36
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
kobash...@gmail.com
on 20 Aug 2014 at 2:44