Closed btracey closed 9 years ago
General comment - always run a local godoc -http=:6060
and look at the rendering.
Where you use "mxn", maybe consider "m⨉n" or "m by n". Similarly for "n x n". Harmonise spacing and use of "by", "x" or "⨉".
For Drotm, s/2 x N/2 x n/ with above consideration.
Okay, I think I got all of the n⨉n rectified.
I also subbed ∗ for * in non-indented blocks for elements that are not accessed. It looks much better in godoc.
PTAL
Fixed Drotg comment. PTAL.
s/on/regarding/ - this may be another language variant conflict.
s/. This agrees with/ and/
Done.
On Feb 5, 2015, at 1:42 PM, Dan Kortschak notifications@github.com wrote:
s/on/regarding/ - this may be another language variant conflict.
s/. This agrees with/ and/ — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/gonum/blas/pull/107#issuecomment-73134781.
It looks like '⨉' is not available on all machines (e.g. not on my workstation). Either try '⨯' (named "Vector or Cross Product"), '×' (named "Multiplication sign" - low unicode point, so probably more available), or revert to 'x'. Sorry.
Otherwise LGTM, thank you.
...ckage