Closed kortschak closed 8 years ago
Lgtm. We probably want a similar disclaimer in native saying that blas didn't specify man and that the behavior of native with nan may change
We probably want a similar disclaimer in native saying that blas didn't specify man and that the behavior of native with nan may change
How would we change it? and why?
Efficiency reasons. I don't have any direct plans, but it seems like ignoring NaNs to various degrees can be notably faster (looking at the openblas thread)
We can probably leave the note for now since we say that the blas implementations follow the BLAS standard.
@btracey Please take a look.
Fixes #118.