Closed btracey closed 8 years ago
LGTM (but I am not an expert, by far, so... please wait for another LGTM)
Ping @vladimir-ch @jonlawlor
LGTM.
PTAL
Sorry for not paying attention earlier. Is TransformNorm
a better name than TransformNormal
? I don't like that the abbreviation becomes a completely different concept (but I can bend easilly).
I'm not particularly fussed. The reason I suggested TransformNorm
over TransformNormal
was that the parameter is called norm
and norm is the usual name for normal operations in places like R.
What is the completely different concept that it becomes?
Probably because of a different background, for me these two words don't mesh together. When I see Norm
, I think of a norm of a vector. But then Transform
doesn't fit, and I become confused. If you think it's fine and if it's used in other places (I know nothing about R), then I'm happy.
OK. MATLAB uses norm in the sense you expect. Maybe we should expand to TransformNormal
and the parameter to normal
to avoid any confusion. @btracey can make the call.
Changed back to TransformNormal
ping
LGTM
PTAL @sbinet @kortschak
Calling this TransformNormal because I think there is room for a Transform() that works on slices generated from the standard uniform.
This is useful for comparing results under two different Gaussians. I can generate a bunch of vectors from a standard normal, and then test the results using Transform with different Gaussians.