Closed chadrockey closed 1 month ago
Hi @chadrockey, so the root cause of most of these issues is lack of torch exportability, you can verify this for yourself by running the following code:
import torch
import torchvision
from ai_edge_torch.debug import find_culprits
# Options are
'''
fasterrcnn_mobilenet_v3_large_320_fpn
fasterrcnn_mobilenet_v3_large_fpn
fasterrcnn_resnet50_fpn
fasterrcnn_resnet50_fpn_v2
fcos_resnet50_fpn
keypointrcnn_resnet50_fpn
maskrcnn_resnet50_fpn
maskrcnn_resnet50_fpn_v2
retinanet_resnet50_fpn
retinanet_resnet50_fpn_v2
ssd300_vgg16
ssdlite320_mobilenet_v3_large
'''
detection_model = torchvision.models.get_model("ssd300_vgg16", weights=None, num_classes=2)
sample_inputs = (torch.rand(1, 3, 320, 320),)
culprits = find_culprits(detection_model, sample_inputs)
culprit = next(culprits)
culprit.print_code()
As such you may need to raise an issue with PyTorch or manually modify the torchvision model to be compliant with Torch.Export. You can find more information here: Debugging & Reporting Errors
Marking this issue as stale since it has been open for 7 days with no activity. This issue will be closed if no further activity occurs.
This issue was closed because it has been inactive for 14 days. Please post a new issue if you need further assistance. Thanks!
Description of the bug:
Possibly related to https://github.com/google-ai-edge/ai-edge-torch/issues/103
Is there a chance that the Torchvision Detection models will be supported? Most of them seem to contain ops that aren't supported and it uses lists as inputs.
Actual vs expected behavior:
Any other information you'd like to share?
No response