Closed WayneLin015 closed 3 years ago
I have the same problem on pose_landmark_upper_body.tflite file but works ok on python API, and I find the tflite outputs value in ld_3d are not normalized to [0~1]
Python API tflite file output
anything update? thanks
I have the same problem on pose_landmark_upper_body.tflite file but works ok on python API, and I find the tflite outputs value in ld_3d are not normalized to [0~1]
Python API tflite file output
@maokk @WayneLin015 How do you test the tflite model ? Can you give me the run.py
? Now I am solving this problem. Thank you ~
@WayneLin015 The results contain 39 points, 1-33 is the pose landmark, 34-39 is auxiliary points for tracking. My tflite result is bad. So can you share your inference code? Thank you~
Hi @WayneLin015, Could you please provide the steps to reproduce the above observation mentioned in the first comment. Thanks!
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you.
Closing as stale. Please reopen if you'd like to work on this further.
Different to the BlazePose paper, it outputs (ld_3d) with the shape of [1,195], in my opinion and previous issue, it should be flatten refer to x, y, z, visibility, presence, so the landmark result will be 39 outputs though its different to paper said that the model output 33 landmark
Another question is, I need to apply any other post or pre processing? Now the output seem there's some shifting The result of 39 points With python API