Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Are you trying to debug the development server or your application? Where did
you insert those code lines that you mentioned?
Original comment by brian.k....@gmail.com
on 28 Jan 2013 at 8:55
I think that I understand better: you entered the pdb comments in the
interactive console with the idea that you could step through your applications
code from there?
Original comment by brian.k....@gmail.com
on 28 Jan 2013 at 8:57
Hi Brian, thanks for the reply and sorry I wasn't clear.
The `import pdb; ...` is in application code, and it starts an interactive
console allowing one to step through the code. There's no reason it couldn't
"step up" into the debugger, but that wasn't my intention when posting the
question so much as debugging a thread of an application.
I hope that clarifies!
Original comment by brianmh...@gmail.com
on 28 Jan 2013 at 10:18
Yes, I understand what you want to do now. But it isn't going to work due to
the design of the Python runtime in devappserver2; sys.stdin and sys.stdout are
pipes connecting the runtime to the devappserver2 parent process.
We should have a better debugging story but it might take us a while to get
there.
Original comment by bquin...@google.com
on 29 Jan 2013 at 2:28
Original comment by bquin...@google.com
on 29 Jan 2013 at 2:29
Thanks for accepting.
As a matter of interest, I have a the highest regards for the Werkzeug debugger
http://werkzeug.pocoo.org/docs/debug/ - and operates in an environment fairly
analogous to the development appserver. While not strictly on point, it would
fall under the rubric of a "better debugging story" :)
Original comment by brianmh...@gmail.com
on 29 Jan 2013 at 12:57
Issue 40 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by bquin...@google.com
on 19 Feb 2013 at 6:24
I can't stress enough the importance of having a working debugger. I'm afraid
the average developer won't use this devserver until they can debug their code,
regardless of any other feature it could have.
Could you provide any insight of how long it will take to fix this? In the
meantime I'm forced to return to the original devserver and I'd prefer not to.
Thanks, and good work
Original comment by xar...@gmail.com
on 19 Feb 2013 at 11:32
I've started working on this and have written up a description of how I expect
it to work:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CCSaRiIWCLgbD3OwmuKsRoHHDfBffbROWyVWWL0ZXN4/
edit?usp=sharing
While pdb doesn't work, I have a prototype that works with Komodo IDE, PyDev,
PyCharm. I would expect that Winpdb would work as well but I haven't tested it.
Feedback welcome!
Original comment by bquin...@google.com
on 5 Mar 2013 at 12:36
I should add that the document that I linked in my last message is meant for
tool providers, not end users. Hopefully tool provides will provide integration
using these hooks without any the user have to know how they work.
Original comment by bquin...@google.com
on 5 Mar 2013 at 12:39
We have hooks in place to make it possible to add debugger support. It is up to
tool vendors now to make use of them.
Original comment by bquin...@google.com
on 11 Mar 2013 at 6:13
So your proposal is to make people re-write the core python debugger to work
with App Engine?
Original comment by adamal...@gmail.com
on 3 Apr 2013 at 12:41
Thanks Brian. Sorry for the delay in giving feedback. The proposed debugger is
a very cool concept.
This issue as posted relates to console/pdb debugging, and it isn't clear to me
how one would take advantage of the proposed concept from the command line.
I think a lot of developers (including myself) who use Vim and Emacs also tend
to be command-line oriented, and we still seem to be without a viable debugging
option.
The tool command line users would take to is almost certainly pdb. We won't see
a pdb patch for GAE, but I am hopeful someone can graft something together on
top of this concept.
All that said, the concept is great and I hope it can be manipulated so that it
can be taken advantage of from the command line.
Since this issue relates specifically to the command line, and that remains an
outstanding issue, we may see duplicate issues posted - it may be useful to
leave the issue open until there is a command line tool someone can point to.
Cheers
Original comment by brianmh...@gmail.com
on 3 Apr 2013 at 12:57
I tried to implement Brian's document recommendations.
Managed to get logging in a remote debugger console, but still no breakpoints.
Exact account of what I did in here:
http://goo.gl/XRU01
Original comment by michael.kariv
on 23 Apr 2013 at 9:03
I'd like to second @Michael.Kariv on his recent post. I'm having an almost
identical experience. Find my exact steps on (text after the 'EDIT:').
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16149813/unable-to-debug-dev-appserver-in-goo
gle-app-engine
I think this issue should be reopened - especially since the sample code in
Brian's document is specific to PyDev - which don't work!!!
PyDev seems to be the canonical debugger/IDE for Python (most traffic in SO,
and #1 recommendation in many questions).
Is I said in my description in SO, I'm able to verify that the
--python_startup_script is called, I am breaking to the remote debugger within
the runtime process, I am able to step out from my script to runtime.py (main
function), and breakpoints to work within the main function. However, putting a
breakpoint in my handler will not work. I cannot imagine how do you imagine us
working without a debugger.
Original comment by u...@london.org.il
on 23 Apr 2013 at 11:06
Another approach could be to monkey patch pdb/ipdb so that they stash the App
Engine stdin/out streams before displaying the prompt and restore them when the
user hits enter. I'd be totally cool with app.pdb.set_trace() instead of import
pdb; pdb.set_trace().
Even better would be to bundle Werkzeug, but let's not get distracted by more
difficult endeavors - whatever is quicker.
Original comment by rban...@gmail.com
on 23 May 2013 at 2:05
Just for information: Pycharm 2.7.2 allow debugging on new SDK.
Original comment by renzon@gmail.com
on 23 May 2013 at 4:27
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
brianmh...@gmail.com
on 28 Jan 2013 at 3:36