Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Original comment by rib...@gmail.com
on 9 Jun 2009 at 5:45
Original comment by rib...@gmail.com
on 26 Jul 2009 at 1:01
Original comment by rib...@gmail.com
on 26 Jul 2009 at 1:02
How about entity-group feature?
I think to use entity.key.id for serial-id is bad idea.
entity.key.id is not unique in a Kind with entity-group feature.
entity.key.id is unique in entries has a common parent.
I tried with low-level API.
example code is attached.
% appcfg.rb run dm_serial.rb
"delete all.."
"delete all.."
["should be blank:", [], []]
=(low level api)=========================
["Parents", Parents(11355), "P1"]
["Parents", Parents(11356), "P2"]
["Children", Parents(11355)/Children(11357), "C3"]
["Children", Parents(11355)/Children(11358), "C4"]
["Children", Parents(11356)/Children(11357), "C5"]
["Children", Parents(11356)/Children(11359), "C6"]
=(datamapper)============================
[#<Parent @sid=11355 @nickname="P1">, "Parents(11355)", nil]
[#<Parent @sid=11356 @nickname="P2">, "Parents(11356)", nil]
[#<Child @sid=11357 @nickname="C3">, "Parents(11356)/Children(11357)",
Parents(11356)]
[#<Child @sid=11358 @nickname="C4">, "Parents(11355)/Children(11358)",
Parents(11355)]
[#<Child @sid=11357 @nickname="C3">, "Parents(11356)/Children(11357)",
Parents(11356)]
[#<Child @sid=11359 @nickname="C6">, "Parents(11356)/Children(11359)",
Parents(11356)]
Original comment by sasaki.t...@gmail.com
on 13 Dec 2009 at 8:00
Attachments:
this is new adapter with :
- use entity-key-string for key
- create entity with parent-entity
- create entity with id or name
- entity-group transaction
Original comment by sasaki.t...@gmail.com
on 19 Dec 2009 at 1:28
Attachments:
I'm not actually an official developer, so take this with a grain of salt,
but...
Two things jump out at me about this patch.
First, it's not actually a patch. When I download the latest code from hg and
run a
diff myself, I see tons of stuff has changed since then. It's hard to tell
right away
which changes you actually intended, and which you didn't. A fork might be
easier,
depending on the situation, but at least a patch.
Second, what is the purpose of LowDS? Aside from build, it seems to be
basically
shortcuts to the AppEngine::Datastore API, and directly to the Java API. I
don't see
where the Java API is needed, and the shortcuts in some cases make things less
readable -- what is 'tx'?
Just my two cents.
Original comment by ninja@slaphack.com
on 27 Dec 2009 at 8:50
Sorry to my poor stuffs.
I created new datastore library project on GitHub.
http://github.com/takeru/tiny_ds
- CRUD like a ActiveRecord or DataMapepr
- set parent, key, id, name, and find by these, YES entity-group-transaction!!
- BASE transaction :
http://blog.notdot.net/2009/9/Distributed-Transactions-on-App-Engine
- query : very thin wrapper of low level API.
- Shout demo app. (sinatra)
- some specs..
Original comment by sasaki.t...@gmail.com
on 30 Dec 2009 at 1:06
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
rib...@gmail.com
on 9 Jun 2009 at 5:43