Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I had the same thought last night. This is also the case for other file types,
right? (not just images: PDF, text file, whatever).
Related question: is there a way from the command line currently to get back to
the original full-sized image/file (other than FUSE mount)?
Original comment by mail...@gmail.com
on 28 Oct 2014 at 9:02
yes, camget. (in particular, see -o and -contents options).
Original comment by mathieu....@gmail.com
on 28 Oct 2014 at 2:00
[deleted comment]
(edited)
I'll work on this.
I think I'll look into adding something on the 'Image' aspect, which is the
default landing for an image when you click on the item from the search view.
Possibly wrapping the image in an anchor and making it clickable to view the
full size, or adding a link below the image to view original size.
This does seem like something that could be opened up to other file types
though, and the 'Permanode' aspect is the common thread for all...so maybe
adding a 'Download' link back to the permanode aspect is the better approach.
Original comment by mail...@gmail.com
on 6 Nov 2014 at 1:41
I could use both, but the second approach (Dowload link) is more important.
I see the 1st one only as a convenience because it is sometimes useful to be
able to view the full size image in your browser (you want to squint at a
particular detail of the picture). I'd see it only as a critical feature if
there's no other way to get the full-size original file.
We should totally have the second approach in the UI at some point (being able
to download any kind of source file from its permanode), and I agree that a
link on the permanode aspect seems like a good place for it. Unless Aaron had
other plans for that?
Anyway, as far as I am concerned either of these approaches fix the issue, but
if you can do both, or preferentially the 2nd one, then even better.
Original comment by mathieu....@gmail.com
on 6 Nov 2014 at 3:20
First draft submitted: https://camlistore-review.googlesource.com/#/c/4046/
Mathieu,
Can you take a quick look and see this is what you were looking for?
Original comment by mail...@gmail.com
on 6 Nov 2014 at 10:55
Yep, that works for me, thanks.
Maybe I'd move the link somewhere else on the page so that it stays obviously
visible even when there's a full page of attributes. But only someone who does
not know the feature exists would miss it, so that's probably nitpicking.
Original comment by mathieu....@gmail.com
on 6 Nov 2014 at 11:15
'View original' link added to the sidebar.
Complete and merged:
https://camlistore-review.googlesource.com/#/c/4046/
Original comment by mail...@gmail.com
on 1 Dec 2014 at 9:15
I've just (sorry I didn't sooner) realized something: having this action in the
sidebar is not the most convenient because we then can't use that action while
browsing images through the image aspect (with left/right arrows, which should
work again soon). I suppose I feel that way since my usage is really
image-centric, and the image aspect is where I spend most of my time in the UI.
Anyway, as far as the issue is concerned, fixed, thanks.
Original comment by mathieu....@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2014 at 2:42
999a148b32f864ca9ef93909455a168d0ed747a6 fixed the issue.
Original comment by mathieu....@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2014 at 2:43
We could play around with exposing the sidebar on the image aspect, which has
the benefit of exposing tagging and download in that view (when using arrows to
navigate).
The downside of that approach is the image will need to be displayed a little
smaller to accommodate the sidebar.
Original comment by mail...@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2014 at 4:18
Well then why not only let the sidebar appear on cue, like on the main page?
the cue could even be the same kind as on the main page, i.e. checkmark on the
corner of the image?
Original comment by mathieu....@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2014 at 4:21
re: having the sidebar appear on command using the checkmark, I'm a little
concerned about causing confusion as to what the checkmark means. In the other
views it is used to select (and the sidebar appears as a result of the
selection). But the case described here seems to be more along the lines of
'show more stuff about this one.' Not that having the sidebar show / hide is a
bad idea, but maybe we should come up with another visual approach to represent
it.
Anyway, we also talked about thinking of the Image detail aspect as more of a
generic 'Preview' which is available to other types of content. So maybe it's
best that 'Image/Preview' should just stick to previewing, and we should
consider displaying the sidebar in the 'Permanode' detail aspect, which I think
would still work for the arrow navigation as it is just one aspect click away.
Original comment by mail...@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2014 at 5:27
This issue has moved to https://camlistore.org/issue/541
Original comment by bradfitz
on 14 Dec 2014 at 11:37
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mathieu....@gmail.com
on 24 Oct 2014 at 5:21