Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Npgsql's implementation may not be complete. And there were bugs with it.
Better to
avoid that.
And also I think it would be slower than the current implementation.
Original comment by havasvol...@gmail.com
on 25 Mar 2010 at 10:06
Hello Otto,
Sure, current extractor implementations won't be replaced with generic. I'm
thinking
of new ones (for yet unsupported databases). In this case having the generic
extractor
might save significant amount of time.
Original comment by Dmitri.Maximov
on 26 Mar 2010 at 4:44
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
Dmitri.Maximov
on 25 Mar 2010 at 7:09