Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
The issue to me is how to maintain quality. PIL handles paletted(gif, png, etc)
and non-paletted images differently and
converting between the two can produce less than desirable results. I'm not an
expert in PIL so there may be ways to make
these conversions without losing as much quality, but my experiments in that
area have all shown poor results. This is
why effects available in Photologue can not be applied to paletted images. I'm
also curious as to how PIL handles TIFF files
and various compression schemes and formats they can contain.
These technical issues aside. If you can come up with code that can perform the
translations, adding a
"CONVERT_TO_WEB_FRIENDLY" setting or adding a "output file type" field to the
photo size model would be fine with me.
- Justin
Original comment by justin.d...@gmail.com
on 11 May 2008 at 2:21
OK, I'll have a play around and see what works.
Cheers,
Nick
Original comment by monsterl...@gmail.com
on 12 May 2008 at 8:16
Got a patch that seems to work... not extensively tested, but It Works For Me.
Original comment by monsterl...@gmail.com
on 18 May 2008 at 8:42
Attachments:
ImageKit now support forcing the output file type and extension for each spec.
Thank
you very much for the patch but I don't think I want to try to support this in
the 2.x
branch.
Original comment by justin.d...@gmail.com
on 23 Jul 2009 at 4:24
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
monsterl...@gmail.com
on 11 May 2008 at 10:59