Use "universal" categories for syntactic constituents

[GoogleCodeExporter]

This issue is a fork of issue 99 where this topic has originally been 
discussed. Here the relevant entries:

---

#7 eckle.kohler

the CoNLL-2009 Shared Task:

Syntactic and Semantic Dependencies in Multiple Languages could be useful in 
this context.
see:
http://www.aclweb.org/anthology-new/W/W09/W09-1201.pdf
"we have prepared a unified format and data for
several very different lanaguages, as a basis
for possible extensions towards other languages
and unified treatment of syntactic depenndecies
and semantic role labeling across natural lan-
guages;"

have to look into the data, though

---

#8 richard.eckart

I believe they just unified the file format, not the tagset. We have readers 
and writers for the file format btw (io.conll).

---

 #11 richard.eckart

This looks very interesting:

http://www.ryanmcd.com/papers/treebanksACL2013.pdf
https://code.google.com/p/uni-dep-tb/

---

Original issue reported on code.google.com by richard.eckart on 12 Nov 2014 at 10:02

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by eckle.kohler on 12 Nov 2014 at 1:22

• Changed title: Use "universal" categories for syntactic dependencies

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by richard.eckart on 12 Nov 2014 at 2:19

• Changed title: Use "universal" categories for syntactic constituents