Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Problem is... There isn't a free input.
Original comment by erezra...@gmail.com
on 3 Mar 2011 at 11:06
Yes, we have some free inputs :-)
Every switch (and we have 6 keys + 4 trims + 7 switches) in its open state can
be used as a digital input for another purpose, an open collector source can
drive this input in parallel with the switch.
Imagine the trainer switch in its normal position (rear position), we can use
the same digital input for a square signal from a simple photodiode board
(maybe we need to use a tx-rx IR diode)or more sophisticated sound detector (as
the iPhone/Android applications).
Do you understand me? Maybe tomorrow I can publish a simple squematics.
My propose is.. if you can program it...I believe I can make the hardware for
it.
Original comment by lupit...@gmail.com
on 4 Mar 2011 at 12:31
Now, that is a nice idea. a built in tachometer. It would make it easy to
adjust the engine's mixture and also choose the right prop without having to
buy an extra gadget. Can any other tx do this?? :-)
Original comment by joaoalve...@googlemail.com
on 4 Mar 2011 at 7:46
Why not use the trainer port ? It can function as an input !!
Original comment by harm.del...@echostar.com
on 4 Mar 2011 at 9:48
We can use the C_0 bit or the G_2 too, they are free.
Or if we can do a major change over the project we can make the arduino
modification (E_0 & E_1 ports changes to C_6 & C_7) and then use the same
programmer port when there are the MISO and MOSI pins for the probes.
Then we will use a tachometer, a thermometer..., with a single 8 pins PIC or
Atmel and communicate it with the Atmega trough the MISO/MOSI pins.
I'm working in the hardware design for a IR tachometer. The acoustic tachometer
seems to much complex.
Original comment by lupit...@gmail.com
on 4 Mar 2011 at 11:44
the MISO and MOSI are already being used for FrSky telemetry. but as you guys
say there are 2 free ports on the tx's atmega. I don't have much knowledge
about this stuff but my guess is that if the sensor is connected to one of
those, someone just had to adapt the FW. maybe we could even select one of the
unsuded swithches for the model we're using.. I'm just dreaming here. as I said
i don't understand much about this..
Original comment by joaoalve...@googlemail.com
on 4 Mar 2011 at 12:26
oh, and then the sensor would fit (in my case) in the slot where the original
antenna was. how perfect would that be? just point the tx at the model's prop
and mesure the rpm.. ;-)
Original comment by joaoalve...@googlemail.com
on 4 Mar 2011 at 12:29
Original comment by erezra...@gmail.com
on 5 Sep 2011 at 5:48
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
lupit...@gmail.com
on 3 Mar 2011 at 10:53