Music Playlist Fanart - Doesn't use MP Artist images

[GoogleCodeExporter]

For example

1. Enable MP Artist Thumb useage in fanart handler

2. I don't have high resolution fanart image for Black Eyed Peas, however i
do have a low resolution MP Artist Thumnbnail for them.

3. In now playing window I have fanart for Black Eyed Peas as expected.

3. In current music playlist window, the black eyed peas image doesn't
display, however other artist with high res fanart display correctly.  I
would expect that since I have enabled MP Artist Thumbnails for fanart, I
would see the Black Eyed Peas picture in music playlist window, just like
what happens in Now Playing Music Window.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by kiwijung...@gmail.com on 25 Jan 2010 at 11:58

[GoogleCodeExporter]

EDIT:

It is now displaying MP Artist Thumbs in the playlist, however only 
intermittently,
perhaps when it only has 1 image for the artist, then the 2nd image control is 
blank,
then it fades between the MP artist image, and a blank image.

Original comment by kiwijung...@gmail.com on 25 Jan 2010 at 12:53

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Hi,

Thank you for your report. Can you please attach your skin file that you use so 
that I 
can test.

best regards
cul8er

Original comment by markus_e...@telia.com on 25 Jan 2010 at 5:27

[GoogleCodeExporter]

http://forum.team-mediaportal.com/attachments/streamedmp-301/54284d1264370527-st
reamedmp-music-files-using-fanart-handler-skinreleaseversion-v1.4.zip

Original comment by kiwijung...@gmail.com on 25 Jan 2010 at 6:06

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Hi,

The only error I find in your xml (and it is not related to this issue) is that 
you 
should have the lines;
    <control>
      <description>FANART IMAGE 1</description>
      <id>897688</id>
      <type>image</type>
      <posX>0</posX>
      <posY>0</posY>
      <width>1280</width>
      <height>720</height>
      <texture>#fanarthandler.music.backdrop1.play</texture>
      <visible>control.isvisible(91919295)+control.isvisible(91919294)</visible>
      <animation effect="fade" start="10" end="100" time="1000" delay="80" 
reversible="false">Visible</animation>
      <animation effect="fade" start="100" end="0" time="900" 
reversible="false">Hidden</animation>
    </control>

    <control>
      <description>FANART IMAGE 2</description>
      <id>897689</id>
      <type>image</type>
      <posX>0</posX>
      <posY>0</posY>
      <width>1280</width>
      <height>720</height>
      <texture>#fanarthandler.music.backdrop2.play</texture>
      <visible>control.isvisible(91919296)+control.isvisible(91919294)</visible>
      <animation effect="fade" start="10" end="100" time="1000" delay="80" 
reversible="false">Visible</animation>
      <animation effect="fade" start="100" end="0" time="900" 
reversible="false">Hidden</animation>
    </control>

you have;
    <control>
      <description>FANART IMAGE 1</description>
      <id>897688</id>
      <type>image</type>
      <posX>0</posX>
      <posY>0</posY>
      <width>1280</width>
      <height>720</height>
      <texture>#fanarthandler.music.backdrop1.play</texture>
      <visible>control.isvisible(91919295)</visible>
      <animation effect="fade" start="10" end="100" time="1000" delay="80" 
reversible="false">Visible</animation>
      <animation effect="fade" start="100" end="0" time="900" 
reversible="false">Hidden</animation>
    </control>

    <control>
      <description>FANART IMAGE 2</description>
      <id>897689</id>
      <type>image</type>
      <posX>0</posX>
      <posY>0</posY>
      <width>1280</width>
      <height>720</height>
      <texture>#fanarthandler.music.backdrop2.play</texture>
      <visible>control.isvisible(91919296)</visible>
      <animation effect="fade" start="10" end="100" time="1000" delay="80" 
reversible="false">Visible</animation>
      <animation effect="fade" start="100" end="0" time="900" 
reversible="false">Hidden</animation>
    </control>

The difference is the "+control.isvisible(91919294)" on image 1 and 2.

cheers
cul8er

Original comment by markus_e...@telia.com on 27 Jan 2010 at 8:01

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Thanks, I've passed that on to Trevor.

Original comment by kiwijung...@gmail.com on 27 Jan 2010 at 9:40

[GoogleCodeExporter]

And I have amended the xml files and passed back to kiwijunglist for testing.

Original comment by tdnemail on 27 Jan 2010 at 10:13

[GoogleCodeExporter]

For me this issue is fixed using 1.1 RC1

Original comment by kiwijung...@gmail.com on 27 Jan 2010 at 1:21

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Thank you for you feedback.

Original comment by markus_e...@telia.com on 27 Jan 2010 at 8:07

• Changed state: Done