Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
The way it currently works is a feature--if the gpx file is deleted, the
corresponding caches will be deleted too
from GeoBeagle.
Original comment by stephen5...@gmail.com
on 15 Jul 2009 at 2:29
I'm hoping that this comment will be answered, but don't know if google code
will
re-open this, or show you it when I answer.
I'll use my case as an example: I copy over the .zip archive that I am sent to
/sdcard/download and then run the import. A week later, I get a new .zip
archive in
my email (same pocket query, same .zip archive name, same .gpx file names in
the .zip
archive).
What happens when I overwrite the old .zip archive with the new .zip archive?
How do
my new caches get imported? How do the old ones get updated?
That's the file I'd like to have GeoBeagle remove: The file under
/sdcard/downloads
that should be useless for the Android user.
Original comment by mjpe...@gmail.com
on 15 Jul 2009 at 2:41
actually there is a bug in the MarketPlace version that keeps this from working
properly; the latest version on
the web site should be better.
What should happen is this: any new .zip files will get re-imported. any old
zip files will get ignored.
GeoBeagle gets the times from inside the zip file itself (it uses the
groundspeak export time, rather than the
file timestamp). caches which were in the old zip file will get deleted.
The idea is that geobeagle is "syncing" with the zip files on disk--what you
see in geobeagle should mirror
the contents of your import directory.
Original comment by stephen5...@gmail.com
on 15 Jul 2009 at 2:48
In which case, let me say wow. I never thought of doing something similar. Neat
idea,
and it seems to work quite quickly.
And thank you for your quick responses!
Original comment by mjpe...@gmail.com
on 15 Jul 2009 at 2:53
Any idea when the new version will be pushed to the market? It's annoying to
reload
my "nearest unfound caches" list and have recently found caches still appear on
the list.
Original comment by d.b.mcg...@gmail.com
on 27 Aug 2009 at 3:19
The version which fixes the bug in comment 5 was pushed weeks ago, in the
middle of
July. Please file a new bug report if you are seeing a problem.
Original comment by stephen5...@gmail.com
on 27 Aug 2009 at 4:06
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mjpe...@gmail.com
on 12 Jul 2009 at 3:46