Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
removed nonsense from patch
Original comment by david.du...@gmail.com
on 13 May 2011 at 8:25
Attachments:
Don't you think a AbstractShape extended by FunctionShape and DecorationShape
should be better?
Because, logically, FunctionShape doesn't inherit from DecorationShape.
Original comment by pierre.r...@gmail.com
on 13 May 2011 at 8:51
That's what I started with, then I noticed that DecorationShape would be empty.
Totally up to you of course, I don't know quite enough just yet. I'm really
just tinkering... hope to add something meaningful eventually.
Original comment by david.du...@gmail.com
on 13 May 2011 at 8:53
You've right, DecorationShape is now empty. But I'll do your refactoring idea
by creating an abstract class. No matter if DecorationShape is empty. I think
some methods will be added.
Thank you to notice this refactoring and hope you will continue to contribute ;)
Original comment by pierre.r...@gmail.com
on 14 May 2011 at 6:34
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
david.du...@gmail.com
on 13 May 2011 at 8:23Attachments: