Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
In my case we're not using custom properties but depend on the default
configuration. Hence, GWTEventService should make two reconnect attempts (as
per
http://code.google.com/p/gwteventservice/source/browse/trunk/conf/eventservice.p
roperties). However, the HTTP monitor in Firefox shows that no
(reconnect)requests are sent once a "regular" request fails because the server
went down.
Original comment by marcel@frightanic.com
on 12 Jul 2012 at 3:12
This functionality is not implemented. The current auto-reconnect feature
reconnects the client when there is a short connection problem, but not when
the server is completely restarted or down for several minutes or hours.
The server could also not receive and deliver any events. How should the user
informed about the server restart? The events of the client/user aren't
processed and the user should get informed over the UI of your application.
This can not be done by GWTEventService.
Original comment by sven.strohschein@googlemail.com
on 16 Jul 2012 at 5:25
Original comment by sven.strohschein@googlemail.com
on 16 Jul 2012 at 5:35
I disagree, this can and should be implemented.
It's true, if we have an interactive application it has to handle
server-not-available situations anyway. Example: server goes down while user is
filling in a form, he pushes submit -> bang, error.
But what about kiosk-style apps with no or very little user interaction? The
front-end my be running unattended for hours but still receive events from an
event service. Then the server goes down for maintenance or software upgrade
and comes back 10min later. An event service client does detect connection
failures anyway. Why can't it be more graceful and give the server some slack
instead of just leaving the game? It could either try to reconnect n times for
the next p minutes with fixed periods or increase the delay until the next
reconnect attempt with every failed attempt (eg. 1min, 2min, 4min, 8min
periods).
Or think about SSO-enabled apps. The server goes down while the user is taking
a 5min coffee break. When he gets back and continues working he might not even
notice that the app was down in the mean time. Sure, his old session is gone
but a new one was created behind the scenes (remember, it's SSO). Of course, it
depends on the app whether session state is persisted or whether there is a
server side session state at all. This is a particular bad situation because
the user doesn't realize he doesn't get and events since everything else works
just fine.
Original comment by marcel@frightanic.com
on 16 Jul 2012 at 6:52
You are right that it would make sense to support auto-reconnect even after a
server restart. I have changed the issue to enhancement instead of discarding
the issue.
As I said before the current implementation handles the case that the client
loses the connection. That is working as intended. When the server is
restarted, all information about the registered clients get lost. Therefore it
is another situation which isn't covered by the current implementation of
auto-reconnect. That is why I have changed the issue from bug to enhancement.
Original comment by sven.strohschein@googlemail.com
on 17 Jul 2012 at 7:35
> I have changed the issue to enhancement instead of discarding the issue.
Ok, for now that's all I was asking for. I didn't know about the subtle
differences with a "reconnect" feature. Thanks for the clarifications.
Now, if you have a release road map for the next few months (v1.2.1? v1.3?),
expected release dates and an idea into which release this enhancement will
make it I'd be even happier.
Original comment by marcel@frightanic.com
on 17 Jul 2012 at 7:42
Planned for version 1.3.
Original comment by sven.strohschein@googlemail.com
on 7 Aug 2012 at 1:49
In the meantime we built a primitive reconnector ourselves. I'll dump the code
here with some explanations and a few words about its limits.
Here's one of the two hooks:
GWT.setUncaughtExceptionHandler(new UncaughtExceptionHandler() {
@Override
public void onUncaughtException(Throwable e) {
if (isGwtEventServiceInitException(e)) {
reconnector.reconnect();
} else {
...
}
}
});
private static boolean isGwtEventServiceInitException(final Throwable t) {
return t instanceof RemoteEventServiceRuntimeException && t.getMessage() != null
&& t.getMessage().startsWith("Error on activating / initializing");
}
Now to the Reconnector itself:
/**
* Attempts to reconnect the GWTEventService to the server. You may invoke this calls as often as
* you want. If the number of calls exceeds the object's internal counter (max reconnect attempts)
* it will display an error message instead. Hence, whenever a connection failure is detected
* somewhere in the application the reconnector should be called to do its magic.
*/
public class Reconnector {
private static final int MAX_RECONNECT_ATTEMPTS = 3;
private static final int RECONNECT_DELAY_BASIS_MILLIS = 1000;
private int reconnectAttemptsCounter = 0;
/**
* C'tor.
*/
public Reconnector() {
addUnlistenListener();
}
private void addUnlistenListener() {
getRemoteService().addUnlistenListener(Scope.LOCAL, new UnlistenEventListenerAdapter() {
@Override
public void onUnlisten(UnlistenEvent unlistenEvent) {
GWT.log("UnlistenEvent occured: isTimeout=" + unlistenEvent.isTimeout() + " isLocal="
+ unlistenEvent.isLocal() + " userId="
+ (unlistenEvent.getUserId() == null ? "" : unlistenEvent.getUserId()) + " domains="
+ (unlistenEvent.getDomains() == null ? "" : unlistenEvent.getDomains()));
reconnect();
}
}, null);
}
/**
* Attempts to reestablish standing connection to the server for the event listener.
*/
public void reconnect() {
reconnectAttemptsCounter++;
if (maxReconnectAttemptsReached()) {
GWT.log("Number of reconnect attempts " + reconnectAttemptsCounter
+ " above max retry limit (" + MAX_RECONNECT_ATTEMPTS
+ ") -> giving up and displaying error message.");
displayNoConnectionError();
} else {
GWT.log("Number of reconnect attempts " + reconnectAttemptsCounter
+ " below or equal the max retry attempts (" + MAX_RECONNECT_ATTEMPTS
+ ") -> reconnecting.");
attemptReconnect();
}
}
private void attemptReconnect() {
final Timer timer = new Timer() {
@Override
public void run() {
initGwtEventService();
}
};
timer.schedule(calculateNextReconnectDelay());
}
private void initGwtEventService() {
final RemoteEventService remoteService = getRemoteService();
remoteService.removeListeners();
remoteService.removeUnlistenListeners(null);
...
more stuff
...
addUnlistenListener();
}
private int calculateNextReconnectDelay() {
return ((int) Math.pow(reconnectAttemptsCounter, 2.0)) * RECONNECT_DELAY_BASIS_MILLIS;
}
private boolean maxReconnectAttemptsReached() {
return reconnectAttemptsCounter > MAX_RECONNECT_ATTEMPTS;
}
private RemoteEventService getRemoteService() {
return RemoteEventServiceFactory.getInstance().getRemoteEventService();
}
private void displayNoConnectionError() {
...
}
}
That works often but not in all cases. It usually works if the application runs
in a standalone Servlet container (we use Tomcat).
For production, however, the Servlet container often runs behind Apache or IIS.
In this case the web server returns 503 (service unavailable) rather quickly as
soon as the connector to the Servlet container detects that the container is
down. This error is not handled anywhere in the application. There's no
unlisten event and GWT doesn't invoke the UncaughtExceptionHandler. Hence, it
goes unnoticed and no reconnection attempts are triggered.
For such cases the remedy might be something like the following (in addition to
the reconnector or instead):
final Timer timer = new Timer() {
@Override
public void run() {
final RemoteEventService remoteEventService = RemoteEventServiceFactory.getInstance()
.getRemoteEventService();
if (remoteEventService.isActive()) {
schedule(10000);
} else {
...
only display error message if used in combination with the reconnector
...
or attempt reconnecting if used instead of the unlisten events in the reconnector
...
}
}
};
timer.schedule(10000);
Original comment by marcel@frightanic.com
on 8 Nov 2012 at 9:09
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
fuellema...@gmail.com
on 27 Apr 2012 at 2:29