search

google-code-export / hfm-net

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/hfm-net
1 stars 0 forks source link

Previously completed project recognized instead #153

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

- Project is not correctly recognized (parsed?). Instead of Project 2683,
Project 2677 (which is the previously completed WU) is displayed.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?

- Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit 6.1.7600 (English w/ Portuguese language pack)
- HFM.NET v0.4.7 revision 104
- vmware player 3.0.0 build 203739

Please provide any additional information below.

- As I remember, \\FAH\fah\ was being used when the issue reported here was
detected. In an attempt to fix it, the client entry in HFM.NET was deleted
and added again, using the corresponding IP instead
(\\192.168.32.128\fah\), but that did not solve the problem.

- No queue data is displayed.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by carlos.c...@gmail.com on 19 Jan 2010 at 1:09

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Do you have the log files still available (FAHlog.txt, unitinfo.txt, and 
queue.dat)?
 I "see" the problem on the screen but I cannot debug what is happening without the
log files.  

If I get no further response to this issue in 7 days I will mark this as 
WontFix as
there are changes coming in these parsing routines anyway.

I appreciate you taking the time to enter the issue and for using HFM.NET!

Original comment by harlam357 on 22 Jan 2010 at 4:02

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
After some time, while still processing the same WU, the correct project number 
was
displayed.

The files FAHlog.txt, unitinfo.txt, and queue.dat were taken now. I hope they 
help.

The file "fah-log (copy and paste).txt" was saved at the time the bug happened.

Original comment by carlos.c...@gmail.com on 24 Jan 2010 at 8:51

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Thanks carlos!  I'll take a look at these. I think I already know the issue 
(it's a
rare occurrence) but this will definitely help confirm it.

Original comment by harlam357 on 25 Jan 2010 at 4:03

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by harlam357 on 25 Jan 2010 at 4:04

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by harlam357 on 15 Feb 2010 at 5:00

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Marked Fixed for Revision 146.

Original comment by harlam357 on 15 Feb 2010 at 5:15